# RADICO KHAITAN LIMITED vs HARISH CHOUHAN

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-03-04
Citation: ARB.P.-1560/2024 2025:DHC:1767
Petitioner: RADICO KHAITAN LIMITED
Respondent: HARISH CHOUHAN

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/MKO04032025AA15602024_191937.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 04.03.2025 ARB.P. 1560/2024 RADICO KHAITAN LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Kamal Garg, Advocate versus HARISH CHOUHAN .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By way of present petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘A&C Act’), the petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole Arbitrator, to adjudicate upon the disputes that have arisen between the parties. 2. The respondent along with his son, Mr. Sumit Chauhan, entered into a business transaction with the petitioner wherein against the purchase orders issued the petitioner supplied alcoholic beverages to the respondent and his son. In pursuance of the same, various tax invoices were issued in the name of the respondent, either by the petitioner or by its subsidiary, associated or sister concerns/units and the subject goods were supplied thereof. 3. Disputes arose between the parties with respect to the various tax 2021. Under the ‘Terms & Conditions’ printed on the aforesaid invoices, Clause 5 provided for referenc

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/radico-khaitan-limited-vs-harish-chouhan