# MANOHAR SINGH vs SAVITA TAYAL & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-03-17
Citation: FAO-84/2023 2025:DHC:1711
Petitioner: MANOHAR SINGH
Respondent: SAVITA TAYAL & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/61017032025FAO842023_111443.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 17th March, 2025 FAO 84/2023 & CM APPL. 17121/2023 MANOHAR SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.S. Tripathy, Ms. Bharti Tripathi, Mr. G.S. Bagga & Mr. Abhinab Chaudhary, Advs. with appellant-in- person. versus SAVITA TAYAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Dabas, Mr. Naveen Dalal, Mr. Sandeep Singh Nainwal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA DHARMESH SHARMA, J. (ORAL) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the appellant/plaintiff under Order XLIII Rule 1 (r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”], assailing the impugned order dated 27.02.2023 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-02, South, Saket Courts, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “trial Court”], whereby his application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC read with Section 151 of the CPC was dismissed for failing the trinity test. 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the record, and shorn of unnecessary details, the appellant/plaintiff has filed a suit seeking a decree of possession concerning property bearing Plot No. 8 (Old Number), now known as D/144-E (New Nu

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/manohar-singh-vs-savita-tayal-anr