# MACMA/386/2012 of PULAVARTHI DANIYELU, W.G.DISTRICT Vs KOLLAM SUDHAKARA BABU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AND ANR.,

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-03-20
Citation: APHC010264502012
Petitioner: MACMA/386/2012 of PULAVARTHI DANIYELU, W.G.DISTRICT
Respondent: KOLLAM SUDHAKARA BABU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AND ANR.,

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010264502012_1_2025-03-21.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010264502012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3365] AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 386/2012 Between: Pulavarthi Daniyelu, W.g.district ...APPELLANT AND Kollam Sudhakara Babu Prakasam District ...RESPONDENT(S) And Anr and Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1. B V KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G.ARUN SHOWRI(CENTRAL GOVT. COUSEL) 2. The Court made the following: 2 Dr.VRKS,J MACMA.No.386 of 2012 THE HON’BLE JUSTICE Dr. V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR MACMA No. 386 of 2012 JUDGMENT: 1. This appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is filed by the appellant/claimant impugning the order dated 22.07.2009 of the learned Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal – Cum –Additional District Judge, Eluru in OP.No.80 of 2007. 2. Heard arguments of Sri BV Krishna Reddy, the learned counsel for appellant and Sri G.Arun Showri, the learned Central Government counsel for respondent No.2. 3. The short question involved in this appeal is whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/macma-386-2012-of-pulavarthi-daniyelu-w-g-district-vs-kollam-sudhakara-babu-prakasam-district-and-anr