# MACMA/1017/2008 of AKULA ANANTHALAKSHMI & 4 OTHERS Vs NETTAM SUNDARAIAH & ANOTHER

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-03-26
Citation: APHC010211962008
Petitioner: MACMA/1017/2008 of AKULA ANANTHALAKSHMI & 4 OTHERS
Respondent: NETTAM SUNDARAIAH & ANOTHER

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010211962008_1_2025-11-06.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No: M.A.C.M.A.No.1017 of 2008 1 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. OFFICE Date ORDER No. NOTE 11 06.11.2025 BSB, J I.A.No.1 of 2025 This application is filed to correct the typographical error in the judgment of appeal as Rs.4,76,435/- (rupees four lakhs seventy six thousand four hundred and thirty five only) instead of Rs.1,76,435/- (rupees one lakh seventy six thousand four hundred and thirty five only). The petitioners / appellants filed claim petition seeking compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- before the Tribunal and paid Court fee thereon. When they filed the appeal, they sought compensation of Rs.9,00,000/-, however, they paid fixed Court fee of Rs.10 only on the appeal. After hearing the appeal on merits, this Court enhanced the amount of compensation from Rs.6,00,000/- to Rs.10,76,435/-, but directed to pay additional Court fee on Rs.1,76,435/-, instead of Rs.4,76,435/-. As such, it is required to amend the said direction in the judgment of appeal and the corresponding decree. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment wherever required. __________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI,J NSM 2

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/macma-1017-2008-of-akula-ananthalakshmi-4-others-vs-nettam-sundaraiah-another-andhra-pradesh-2