# M/S ATHLESIS EOK & ANR. vs MANU SAWHNEY & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-03-03
Citation: CM(M)-419/2025 2025:DHC:1413
Petitioner: M/S ATHLESIS EOK & ANR.
Respondent: MANU SAWHNEY & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/62703032025CMM4192025_173110.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 03.03.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, CM(M) 419/2025 M/S ATHLESIS EOK & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar and Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Advs. versus MANU SAWHNEY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arjun Dewan and Mr. Shahryar Khan, Advs. for R-1 & R-2. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT (ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. CM APPL. 12586/2025 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) 419/2025 & CM APPL. 12585/2025 STAY 1. The petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 22.02.2025, passed by the court of learned District Judge (Commercial) (Digital-07), South-East, Saket Court, New Delhi in case titled “Manu Sawhney & Anr. Vs. Athlesis Eok & Ors.” Bearing CS (Comm.) No. 417/2022. 2. Respondents No. 1 & 2 filed a suit for recovery allegedly due CM(M) 419/2025 3. Upon completion of pleadings, while the case was at the stage of evidence (PE), an oral request was made by the learned counsel for the respondents seeking permission to present the witness, PW-1 (Mr. Manu Sawhney), who resides in Dubai through Video Conferencing [“VC”]. The lear

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/m-s-athlesis-eok-anr-vs-manu-sawhney-ors