# KISHORE KUMAR vs SURESH SETHI & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-03-20
Citation: CM(M)-3987/2024 2025:DHC:1844
Petitioner: KISHORE KUMAR
Respondent: SURESH SETHI & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60920032025CMM39872024_181142.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 20th March, 2025 CM(M) 3987/2024 & CM APPL. 70878-70880/2024 KISHORE KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suvendra Mishra, Ms. Sonal Mishra and Mr. Utkarsh Mishra, Advs. versus SURESH SETHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Bhakti P Sethi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The situation in the present case is peculiar. 2. The petitioner herein is a tenant who is defending eviction petition filed on the ground of bonafide requirement. 3. During the pendency of the above said petition, the tenant had contended before the learned Rent Controller that since the petitioner had been claiming rent @ Rs. 50,000/- per month, the petition, being beyond the jurisdiction of the learned Rent Controller, should have been dismissed. Learned Rent Controller, taking note of the fact that in the petition, the rent was mentioned as Rs. 100/- per month, which fact had not even been controverted by the tenant, observed that the petition was maintainable under Delhi Rent Control Act,1958 (in short “DRC Act”) 4. Such order is under challenge. 5. Learned Counsel for respondent/Landlord, however, apprises about on

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/kishore-kumar-vs-suresh-sethi-ors