# KAMLESH KHANNA vs GEETA SARDANA

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-03-11
Citation: RC.REV.-416/2016 2025:DHC:2259
Petitioner: KAMLESH KHANNA
Respondent: GEETA SARDANA

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59011032025RCR4162016_184923.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 11.03.2025 RC.REV. 416/2016 KAMLESH KHANNA .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Ajay Chaudhary, Mr. Vikram Singh, Mr. Bharat Chaudhary and Mr. Anurag Singh Tomar, Advocates for LR-2 of the Petitioner. versus GEETA SARDANA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar and Mr. Sumit Kashyap, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition seeks to challenge an order dated 04.06.2016 passed by the learned SCJ/RC (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the Application for Leave to Defend/Contest filed by the Petitioner/tenant has been dismissed. The premises in issue are one shop in property bearing No. A-11, Gali No.1, Jagat Puri, Delhi-51 as shown in the red colour in the site plan annexed with the Eviction Petition [hereinafter referred to as “subject premises”]. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant has made two submissions before this Court. He submits in the first instance that the need of the 2.1 Secondly, it is contended by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant that there are several additi

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/kamlesh-khanna-vs-geeta-sardana