# CRP/347/2025 of Pamarthi Venkaiah, Vs Dhanekula Srinath,

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-03-27
Citation: APHC010059322025
Petitioner: CRP/347/2025 of Pamarthi Venkaiah,
Respondent: Dhanekula Srinath,

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010059322025_1_2025-03-28.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010059322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3299] (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 347/2025 Between: Pamarthi Venkaiah, ...PETITIONER AND Dhanekula Srinath ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K. R. RAGHAVENDRA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 347/2025 ORDER: Heard Sri K.R.Raghavendra Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.283 of 2019 on the file of Rent Controller – cum – IV Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division). In the said suit an order to proceed ex-parte was passed against the defendant. The suit was decreed ex-parte on 12.04.2019. The ex-parte decree was put to execution. 3. During pendency of the execution petition, the defendant/respondent filed an application to set aside the ex-parte decree dated 12.04.2019. He also filed an application for condonation of delay of 1065 days. The application under Section 5 of limitation Act was allowed. The del

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/crp-347-2025-of-pamarthi-venkaiah-vs-dhanekula-srinath