# CRLRC/1987/2010 of K.MESHAK, DILSUKHNAGAR, HYDERABAD Vs G.APPALARAJU, KAKINADA AND ANR, REP.BY P.P.,HIGH COURT, HYD

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-03-23
Citation: APHC010670002010
Petitioner: CRLRC/1987/2010 of K.MESHAK, DILSUKHNAGAR, HYDERABAD
Respondent: G.APPALARAJU, KAKINADA AND ANR, REP.BY P.P.,HIGH COURT, HYD

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010670002010_1_2025-03-24.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010670002010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3521] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1987/2010 Between: K.meshak, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND G Appalaraju Kakinada And Anr Rep By P P High Court ...RESPONDENT(S) Hyd and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R GOPI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revision petition become infructuous in as much as the respondent No.1/ complainant is died. 2. The revision was filed by the accused/ petitioner against the order of allowing the application filed under Section 311 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for brevity Cr.P.C.), to recall P.W.1 for marking document. 2 3. In view of the death of the respondent No.1/ complainant, the revision has become infructuous. Therefore, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/crlrc-1987-2010-of-k-meshak-dilsukhnagar-hyderabad-vs-g-appalaraju-kakinada-and-anr-rep-by-p-p-high-court-hyd