# CRLP/9365/2022 of Pathina Chandra Rao, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-03-25
Citation: APHC010636872022
Petitioner: CRLP/9365/2022 of Pathina Chandra Rao,
Respondent: State of Andhra Pradesh

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010636872022_1_2025-03-26.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

1 HN, J Crl.P.No.9365_2022 APHC010636872022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9365/2022 Between: Pathina Chandra Rao, and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. Munduru Eswar Brahmanand Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. B V APARNA LAKSHMI 2 HN, J Crl.P.No.9365_2022 The Court made the following Order: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 is the brother-in-law of Accused No.1 and petitioner No.2 is the brother of Accused No.1. The respondent No.2 had married the Accused No.1, and on account of marital disputes, she filed a complaint before the police. After completing the investigation, the police filed a charge sheet and registered the case as C.C.No.472 of 2022, on the file of Junior I Class Magistrate, Amudulavalasa, Srikakulam District. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, initially the Court did no

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/crlp-9365-2022-of-pathina-chandra-rao-vs-state-of-andhra-pradesh