# CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (MAHARASHTRA vs SURESH SHANTARAM GONDHALI AND ANR.

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-03-04
Citation: IA/729/2022
Petitioner: CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (MAHARASHTRA
Respondent: SURESH SHANTARAM GONDHALI AND ANR.

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6ImhXZGNCQk1nR1BGdnVsTkxqb3dSaWc9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiL0t0UUZHNFNMbG1BdzErVkJKWGhWeWZ5ci9TcXlRZE9qZStUMHZxZWloWXAxTWFyRkk2ME5PcCtVMTFGamxqVWgybEd0SEYzd3c3Nk9NRVJJZklSNWc9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjQ4ODI5ODRmNThkYjc3Y2QzOTg5MDFmMzQ2NmE5Y2MzYjVhYzNjZTVmY2U5Nzk0YjNjMGVmZGFhMmQyMjJlNzMiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782776810&signature=d0dc1ffc2dba0c640633b167ab859cb77eb7c44e5abbde37498c3e06421df4f9)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

wp-778-2018 Ors(F1).docx Amol IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 778 OF 2018 1. Avinash Dhavji Naik ] Age:- 54 years, ] 2. Arun Dhavji Naik ] Age:- 51 years, ] Both residing at Bamandongri, ] Taluka Panvel, District Raigad 410206 ]…Petitioners VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra ] Through the Secretary ] Revenue and Forest Department, ] Mantralaya, Mumbai. ] 2. The Deputy Collector ] (Land Acquisition), ] Metro Centre No.1, Panvel, ] AMOL PREMNATH Having address as CIDCO Samaj ] JADHAV Mandir Building, Near Banthia High ] School, Taluka Panvel, ] 410206. ] JADHAV Date: 2025.03.04 12:53:25 +0530 3. The Deputy Collector ] (Land Acquisition), ] Metro Centre No. 3, Panvel, ] Having address as CIDCO Samaj ] Mandir Building, Near Banthia High ] School, Taluka Panvel, ] District Raigad 410206. ] 4. The City and Industrial Development ] Corporation (Maharashtra) Limited ] 1 wp-778-2018 Ors(F1).docx (CIDCO), ] Having its registered office at ] Nirmal, 2nd floor, Nariman Point, ] Mumbai 400021, And having its ] Head Office at CIDCO Bhavan, ] C.B.D. Belapur, Navi-Mumbai 400614 ] Through its Managing Director ]…Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLI

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/city-and-industrial-development-corporation-maharashtra-vs-suresh-shantaram-gondhali-and-anr