# CIENA CORPORATION vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-03-07
Citation: W.P.(C)-IPD-15/2025 2025:DHC:1615
Petitioner: CIENA CORPORATION
Respondent: UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/ABL07032025WO152025_123421.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 07th March, 2025 W.P.(C)-IPD 15/2025 & CM 49-51/2025 CIENA CORPORATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Samar Bansal, Mr. K. Rigved Prasad, Mr. Aman Bajaj, Mr.Kaustubh Chaturvedi and Mr. Vedant Kapur, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Barathi, SPC with Ms. Mamta Tiwari, G.P. with Ms. Rasya Rawal, Advocate for UOI & CGPDT, R-1 & R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL AMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking setting aside of the letter dated 16th February, 2024, passed by respondent No.2 in the PCT National Phase Application No.202017034476, whereby, the patent application filed on behalf of the petitioner has been deemed to be abandoned (hereinafter “Abandonment Letter”). 2. In view of the limited issue involved in the present petition, with the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for disposal at this stage itself. 3. Brief facts necessary for deciding the present petition are set out below:- i. The present Indian patent application pertains to ‘Modular Network Element Architecture’, a new type of modular network element invented by the employee

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/ciena-corporation-vs-union-of-india-ors
