# CC/1819/2017 of Smt.V.Venkata Ramani Vs Sri Anil Kumar Singhal,

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-03-27
Citation: APHC010089282017
Petitioner: CC/1819/2017 of Smt.V.Venkata Ramani
Respondent: Sri Anil Kumar Singhal,

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010089282017_1_2025-03-28.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010089282017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3504] (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1819/2017 Between: Smt.v.venkata Ramani ...PETITIONER AND Sri Anil Kumar Singhal and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V.DYUMANI (SC for TTD) The Court made the following order: This contempt case is filed against the respondent for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 13.06.2017 passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.Nos.23140 and 23141 of 2017 in W.P.No.18987 of 2017. 2. Mr.Marala Sai Teja, learned counsel representing Mr.N.Madhava Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present contempt case is filed for willful disobedience of interim orders, however, subsequently main Writ Petition itself was disposed of. He further submits that in view of the disposal of main Writ Petition, the Contempt case may be closed. 3. Considering the said submission, the Contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 2 As a sequel, interlocutory applications

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/cc-1819-2017-of-smt-v-venkata-ramani-vs-sri-anil-kumar-singhal