# AHMED RAZA vs NITISH JAIN

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-03-17
Citation: RFA(COMM)-512/2024 2025:DHC:1877-DB
Petitioner: AHMED RAZA
Respondent: NITISH JAIN

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/VIB17032025RFAC5122024_131723.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 17.03.2025 RFA(COMM) 512/2024 & CM APPL. No.75412/2024 AHMED RAZA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Fahim Khan, Adv. Versus NITISH JAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ram Prakash Soni, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (Oral) 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 04.09.2024 [the impugned order] passed by the learned Commercial Court in a suit involving a commercial dispute being CS(COMM) 314/2024 captioned Nitish Jain v. Ahmed Raza. 2. In terms of the impugned order, the learned Commercial Court allowed the application filed by the respondent [plaintiff in CS(COMM) 314/2024] under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [ the CPC] seeking a decree on admission. 3. The respondent [hereafter also referred to as the plaintiff] had filed the aforementioned suit [being CS(COMM) 314/2024] for recovery of a sum of ₹14,74,236/- along with interest from the date of institution of the 4. The plaintiff claimed that it had supplied garments/fabric to the appellant [hereafter also referred to as the defendant] in the normal course of busine

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/march/ahmed-raza-vs-nitish-jain