# REKHA P. THAPAR AND 7 ORS. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SR. INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND 6 ORS.

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-06-10
Citation: WP/659/2018
Petitioner: REKHA P. THAPAR AND 7 ORS.
Respondent: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SR. INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND 6 ORS.

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6IlREOERwK0FyaUtqNW5KajVTbFpSY1E9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiRHAvVTI4YnMxYWtjSHBkcmNYNlRId0JqZVVwaGIyMFdGdG8zcEdIcUhqVmxBL05RcVF2T2hndTZFaUlROGt4MkFSZ1NkWXNXVmkzU0FqNW5mcTlxUXc9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjhjMWE4NDAyMTA1NTdiY2E5NGJiYzg1NmVmZWQ4MWRjY2UzOWFjZTgwMDdjOGUyMWY1ZWYxZjA1MWFmZjdhMGMiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782776008&signature=03cd38088e9039593f35bb45414e6aeb099a4b5a101b8c3cb229bce2fb686eb9)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

1-wp-659-2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION 037. ] 2 Hedric Dsouza ] Age: 59 years, Occ: Retired ] of Mumbai Indian Inhabitant ] residing at Sagittarius, C-706, Divya ] Park, Jankalyan Nagar, Malad (W), ] 400 095. ] 3 Antony Xavier Fernando ] of Mumbai Indian Inhabitant ] Age: 54 years, Occu: Business, residing ] at Room No.423, A/32, BMC Chawl, ] Dr. Ambedkar Road, M.L. Camp, ] Mumbai 400 019. ] 4 Sangeeta Kanaujia ] of Mumbai Indian Inhabitant ] Age: 29 years, Occ: Housewife ] residing at A/203, Geeta Gayatri ] Apt., Near Kalavati Mandir ] old M. B. Estate, Near MGM School, ] Virar (West) 401 303. ] 5 Jalil Ahmed Shaikh ] of Mumbai Indian Inhabitant ] Age: 52 years, Occ: Retired ] residing at J/402, Premier Residences ] Opp: Kohinoor Kamani, Kurla (W). ] Mumbai 400 070. ] JUNE 10th, 2025 S.R.JOSHI 1-wp-659-2018.doc 6 Mushtaque Shaikh ] of Mumbai Indian Inhabitant ] Age: 49 years, Occ: Business ] residing at 38/A, Sami Compound, ] Room No.6, M. P. Marg (Pipe Road), ] Kurla (W), Mumbai 400 070. ] 7 Jacinta D’Souza ] of Mumbai Indian Inhabitant ] Age: 50 years, Occ: Service ] residing at A3 Everard Nagar, ] Eastern Express Highway

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/june/rekha-p-thapar-and-7-ors-vs-state-of-maharashtra-through-sr-inspector-of-police-and-6-ors