# VINOD KUMAR AND ANR vs NEERAJ MITTAL AND ORS

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-07-08
Citation: CM(M)-1175/2025 2025:DHC:5477
Petitioner: VINOD KUMAR AND ANR
Respondent: NEERAJ MITTAL AND ORS

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60908072025CMM11752025_113843.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 08th July, 2025 CM(M) 1175/2025 & CM APPL. 39528-39530/2025 VINOD KUMAR AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Dr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate (Through VC) versus NEERAJ MITTAL AND ORS .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 39529-39530/2025 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 1175/2025 & CM APPL. 39528/2025 1. Petitioners are plaintiffs before the learned Trial Court and are aggrieved by dismissal of their application moved under Section 151 CPC. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that, initially, they had filed a site plan but due to some oversight and inadvertence, site plan was not specifying the directions appropriately and it was rather submitted “upside down”. 3. When the plaintiffs realized such inadvertent mistake, they moved an application under Section 151 CPC with request to take on record the “correct site plan”. It was also mentioned in the above application that locality in question is “Adarsh Nagar Extension” and due to oversight, such locality was described as “Adarsh Nagar”. According to plaintiffs, these are two different 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/july/vinod-kumar-and-anr-vs-neeraj-mittal-and-ors