# VIKRAM SINGH vs STATE THROUGH SUBHASH PLACE POLICE STATION

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-07-18
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-4380/2024 2025:DHC:5812
Petitioner: VIKRAM SINGH
Respondent: STATE THROUGH SUBHASH PLACE POLICE STATION

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/61718072025BA43802024_163446.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 18.07.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + BAIL APPLN. 4380/2024 VIKRAM SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Goswami, Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Mr. Mohak Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE THROUGH SUBHASH PLACE POLICE STATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP with SI Neeraj Kumar, PS-Subhash Place. Mr. Basant Kumar Singh and Mr. Harsh Raj Singh, Adv. for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT (ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. CRL.M.A. 35833/2024 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 4380/2024 1. The present bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 97/2021 registered under Sections 420/120B/34 IPC Bail Appln. 4380/2024 2. The brief facts of the present case are that the complainant, a property dealer in Burari and partner of Rajan Seth, alleged that in May 2018, he was approached by the applicant, Vikram Singh and co- accused Anjaneyan Ullanattu who introduced themselves as having business in UAE through M/s AL Manakh Managements Consultancy, Sharjah, engaged in distribution and screening of South Indian films. Allegedly, on

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/july/vikram-singh-vs-state-through-subhash-place-police-station