# VIDYA RAI vs NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-07-11
Citation: W.P.(C)-8389/2025 2025:DHC:5479
Petitioner: VIDYA RAI
Respondent: NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59311072025CW83892025_205723.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on: 11.07.2025 W.P.(C) 8389/2025 VIDYA RAI .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person. versus NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Khanna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Mr. Tarandeep Singh and Ms. Vilakshana Dayma, Advs. for R- l/NTA Mr. Devashish Bhadauria, Sr. Panel Counsel for R-2/UOI. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal and Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra, Advs. for University of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN JUDGMENT VIKAS MAHAJAN, J 1. The controversy in the present writ petition revolves around challenge to four questions and their answer key(s), in LL.M. Entrance Exam. 2. The case set out by the petitioner in the present petition is that she is a law graduate from Faculty of Law, B.H.U. (Varanasi) and had applied for Post-Graduate Entrance Examination conducted by respondent no.1/NTA namely, Common University Entrance Test (CUET-PG) 2025 for LL.M with subject code COQP-14. 3. The petitioner applied for LL.M. (COQP-14) on 19.01.2025 and 2025. As per the petitioner, out of the total 75 questions, there were approximately three questions in the entrance exa

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/july/vidya-rai-vs-national-testing-agency-anr