# RINKU vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-07-09
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-2448/2025 2025:DHC:5403
Petitioner: RINKU
Respondent: THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60809072025BA24482025_181901.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09.07.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2448/2025 & CRL.M.A. 19290/2025 RINKU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pratap Ranjan Sahani and Mr. Monoranjan Padhi, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 344/2023 of PS Nabi Karim for offences under Section 323/342/377/365/367/506/34 IPC and 67A IT Act. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/ applicant is that along with his four accomplices (out of whom one has absconded while others are in jail), he abducted the victim and after taking off his clothes, beat him up; and thereafter they committed sodomy on the victim and also inserted penis of one of the assailants forcibly in his mouth while filming the entire assault. The video clicked by the accused persons was circulated by them on the social media. BAIL APPLN. 2448/2025 pages 2. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that the accused/applicant was not named in the first complaint sent by the victim to the Chief Justice of India. It is further submitted that 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/july/rinku-vs-the-state-of-nct-of-delhi