# RAMBETI vs PANDIT RAM KISHAN SHARMA

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-07-22
Citation: CM(M)-835/2025 2025:DHC:5988
Petitioner: RAMBETI
Respondent: PANDIT RAM KISHAN SHARMA

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60922072025CMM8352025_113949.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 22nd July, 2025 CM(M) 835/2025 & CM APPL. 27132-27133/2025 RAMBETI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pratap Sahani and Mr. Manish Kumar Badal, Advocates. versus PANDIT RAM KISHAN SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner herein is defending an eviction petition which has been filed on the ground of bona fide requirement. 2. Leave to defend was granted to the tenant (petitioner herein) and case was put to trial. 3. When the case was at the stage of tenant’s evidence, she sought time to move an application for summoning additional witnesses. Her endeavour was to dispute and disprove the ownership of the landlord over the tenanted premises. 4. However, her such request has been declined vide order dated 11.02.2025. 5. She, thereafter, challenged abovesaid order by filing an appeal, which was also dismissed by learned District Judge vide order dated 09.04.2025. 6. Such order dated 09.04.2025 is under challenge. 7. Pursuant to notice issued by this Court, learned counsel for respondent (landlord) has appeared and submits that, without prejudice to h

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/july/rambeti-vs-pandit-ram-kishan-sharma