# MST NAYAB BEGUM vs ARMAN ULLAH QURESHI & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-07-29
Citation: CM(M)-637/2025 2025:DHC:6340
Petitioner: MST NAYAB BEGUM
Respondent: ARMAN ULLAH QURESHI & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60929072025CMM6372025_160605.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 29th July, 2025 CM(M) 637/2025 & CM APPL. 20241-20243/2025 MST NAYAB BEGUM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Chaudhary, Advocate. versus ARMAN ULLAH QURESHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shazeb, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 appears pursuant to notice. 2. The point involved in the present petition is very short. 3. A suit was filed by plaintiffs seeking cancellation of sale deed, possession and injunction. 4. When the case was taken up by the learned Trial Court on 07.07.2024, learned Trial Court declined to give any further opportunity to plaintiffs to lead their evidence and their right was, accordingly, closed. 5. An application was moved by the plaintiffs seeking recall of the abovesaid order. 6. According to plaintiffs, earlier, part-testimony of plaintiff No.2 was recorded in the Court but, since, she suffered paralysis and was not even able to speak on account of her such medical condition and was under medical observation, she wanted her daughter-in-law to be examined for the purposes of substantiating the case of plainti

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/july/mst-nayab-begum-vs-arman-ullah-qureshi-anr