# Mahendra Kumar Nandlal Patel and Anr vs Samir Mahendra Shah

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-07-01
Citation: ARBP/568/2025
Petitioner: Mahendra Kumar Nandlal Patel and Anr
Respondent: Samir Mahendra Shah

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6InZpek41L0JZN3k1emxCbGZmU2VFMkE9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiaTNvY3ZHTktKYmQ3VFowTnl2cXNGVDcxN0FWb05OU1dtUEwwSDlMKzNwcXNxbVV0RmRrUXNYQnVFYURaUURBb3VGb3VTUHVBalYyYmNmZEY4bnN1dlE9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjAxMDYxNDE4MzFhMjU5ZTQxZjFhMWZlNWEwM2I0YzE3OWZmMWI2ZWYzODY2MGZmNzc4OTI2NWEwNTBkMWJjNDIiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782775718&signature=7e668ef8f21463f205e2e21d2a2077a961acae058c3216e6bd9603b78f209d18)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

912-ARBPL-17066-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 17066 OF 2025 1. This Petition is an Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”) to an order dated May 17, 2025 passed under Section 17 of the Act (“ Impugned Order”). It is the case of the Petitioners that they had been made partners of Alexis Hospitality LLP, Respondent No. 5 (“Alexis”) with a 20% share upon contribution of land until then owned by them, on which a building was constructed and is currently being used as a hotel which is the business of the LLP. 2. It is common ground that the Petitioners were not meant to manage the LLP and they were not the “ designated partners” of Alexis. The disputes and differences between the parties were referred to the Learned Arbitral July 1, 2025 Shraddha 912-ARBPL-17066-2025.doc Tribunal, which was presented with an application under Section 17 of the Act essentially seeking an urgent intervention into expulsion of the Petitioners from the LLP. By the time of such application, the Petitioners' interests in the LLP were in the region of 6%. 3. The prayers in the Sectio

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/july/mahendra-kumar-nandlal-patel-and-anr-vs-samir-mahendra-shah