# M/S SITA RAM IRON FOUNDRY AND ENGINEERING WORKS vs HINDUSTAN TECHNOCAST (P) LTD. AND ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-07-09
Citation: C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)-150/2021 2025:DHC:5395
Petitioner: M/S SITA RAM IRON FOUNDRY AND ENGINEERING WORKS
Respondent: HINDUSTAN TECHNOCAST (P) LTD. AND ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59209072025COT1502021_212002.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 150/2021 M/S SITA RAM IRON FOUNDRY AND ENGINEERING WORKS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Shravan Kumar Bansal, Mr. Rishi Bansal, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Mr. Pankaj Kumar and Mr. Deepak Srivastava, Advocates. Mob: 9990389539 Email: amitabh@unitedandunited.com versus HINDUSTAN TECHNOCAST (P) LTD. AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC along with Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate for Registrar of Trademarks. Mob: 9810982923 Email: radhika.arora21@gmail.com Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Dev Pratap and Mr. Varun Pratap Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mob: 9355665877 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA JUDGMENT % 09.07.2025 MINI PUSHKARNA, J: 1. The present petition has been filed under Sections 47, 57 and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“the Trade Marks Act”), seeking 1945. 2. As recorded in the order dated 18th January, 2022, the present petition has been received from the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (“IPAB”), consequent to its abolition and upon promulgation of the Tribunals Reforms (Rationalization and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021. 3. This Court notes that

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/july/m-s-sita-ram-iron-foundry-and-engineering-works-vs-hindustan-technocast-p-ltd-and-anr