# M/S. ACCUFIL AUTOMATION vs CHITKARA BEVERAGES & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-07-02
Citation: CM(M)-1108/2025 2025:DHC:5231
Petitioner: M/S. ACCUFIL AUTOMATION
Respondent: CHITKARA BEVERAGES & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60902072025CMM11082025_181254.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 02nd July, 2025 CM(M) 1108/2025 & CM APPL. 37619-37621/2025 M/S. ACCUFIL AUTOMATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prateek Choudhary and Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocates. versus CHITKARA BEVERAGES & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner (defendant No.1 before the learned Trial Court) is defending a suit which seeks damages to the tune of Rs.51,99,000/-. 2. The issues have already been framed and the case is at the stage of plaintiff’s evidence and it was at the abovesaid stage that the defendant No.1 moved an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground that there was no cause of action. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by dismissal of his such application. 4. This Court has gone through the impugned order dated 06.05.2025 and according to the observations appearing therein, the application was held as not maintainable under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as the aspect which had been highlighted by the defendant No.1 in their abovesaid application could be appreciated only once the evidence was led. 5. The r

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/july/m-s-accufil-automation-vs-chitkara-beverages-ors