# JOHNSON & JOHNSON PTE. LTD. vs MR. ABBIREDDI SATISH KUMAR & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-07-15
Citation: CS(COMM)-801/2023 2025:DHC:5622
Petitioner: JOHNSON & JOHNSON PTE. LTD.
Respondent: MR. ABBIREDDI SATISH KUMAR & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59215072025SC8012023_171752.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 801/2023 & I.A. 1741/2024, I.A. 31225/2024, I.A. 31226/2024, I.A. 1880/2025 JOHNSON & JOHNSON PTE. LTD. .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Nancy Roy, Advocate with Mr. Lalit Alley, Advocate. Mob: 9711288594, 8376067286 Email: mailto:nroy@indiaip.com, mailto:lalley@indiaip.com versus MR. ABBIREDDI SATISH KUMAR & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Kishore Babu Manne, Advocate for defendant nos. 1 to 6. Mob: 8610374697 Email: babumannefirst@gmail.com Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for defendant nos. 2 and 5. (M): 8096321409 Email: I.vinay@icloud.com CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA JUDGMENT % 15.07.2025 MINI PUSHKARNA, J: I.A. No. 1880/2025 (Application under Order VIII Rules 1 & 10) 1. The instant application has been preferred by the plaintiff under Order 2. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 134(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“the Act”), read with Sections 27 and 29 of the Act and Section 20(c) of CPC, seeking permanent and mandatory injunction thereby restraining passing off and infringement of plaintiff‟s marks /trade dress, i.e., “ORS-L”/ “ORSL”/ / / / . 3. The suit is filed on the grounds that the m

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/july/johnson-johnson-pte-ltd-vs-mr-abbireddi-satish-kumar-ors