# APOORVA ULHAS HADKAR AND VIRAJ ULHAS HADKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 2 ORS.

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-07-25
Citation: WP/183/2019
Petitioner: APOORVA ULHAS HADKAR AND VIRAJ ULHAS HADKAR
Respondent: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 2 ORS.

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6IkdpMWFRVzU5V1A2MjZMMU1CT3hDQ2c9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiQ1ZmQ1VYb2ovcktuTHNPVTVmaTRLVHFSZElFN1Y4T3B1Zmt3aW5STGxpa1FhM1c3MUNvQkVFbXZHOURTcFc5ejN1elhURVViLzZ3VU1EU2RRQ0JwZXc9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjEyZjAxODk0ZDI3YTY4NmY3NGE0ZWRkNTI3MjI3YWU0NjVkYmI4NWUwOTU5NTQ1ODJkM2IyMjAwNmIyYzU0MDYiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782775422&signature=8d69751d79995f5e526ea6907ae93fd7e6361f64fde0fa4f1d14c08b67cd8d92)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

901-NMW-180-2016.doc Ashwini IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1658 OF 2012 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.180 OF 2016 Sameer Subhash Patil ] Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ] Respondents a/w WRIT PETITION NO.547 OF 2017 a/w INTERIM APPLICATION [L] NO.14400 OF 2023 a/w INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1769 OF 2022 a/w WRIT PETITION NO.1658 OF 2012 a/w NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1 OF 2021 a/w NOTICE OF MOTION NO.439 OF 2019 a/w INTERIM APPLICATION NO.928 OF 2020 a/w INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2782 OF 2022 a/w NOTICE OF MOTION NO.5 OF 2021 a/w REVIEW PETITION [L] NO.72 OF 2017 IN 2012. Mr. Shubham Bane i/b Sandeep Bane, Ms. Pooja Bane, Mr. Atharva Bane, Ms. Shefali Jadhav for Petitioner in other Petitions. 2 of 29 901-NMW-180-2016.doc Mr. J. M. D’Silva a/w V. N. Gupta for Petitioner in WP/547/2017. Mr. Mahendra Agvekar a/w Ms. Shraddha Chavan for Intervenor/Applicant in IA/928/2020 in WP/1658/2012. Mr. P. G. Lad a/w Ms. Aparna Kalathil and Ms. Anjali Maskar for MHADA. Mr. G.S. Godbole, Senior Advocate, a/w Mr. Chaitnya Chavan, Ms. Pushpa Yadav i/b Ms. Komal Punjabi for BMC in WP/1658/2012 and WP/547/2017. Mr. Jitendra Khonde, Execu

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/july/apoorva-ulhas-hadkar-and-viraj-ulhas-hadkar-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra-and-2-ors