# AMIT vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-07-15
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-1386/2025 2025:DHC:5614
Petitioner: AMIT
Respondent: STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60815072025BA13862025_182636.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 15.07.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1386/2025 & CRL.M.A. 10801/2025 (for stay/directions) AMIT .....Petitioner Through: None. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with SI Neeraj Kumar. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.246/2024 of PS Subhash Place for offence under section 386/34 IPC. 2. None appears for the accused/applicant. 3. Learned APP accepts notice. I have heard the learned APP assisted by IO/SI Neeraj Kumar. 4. Broadly speaking, the prosecution case through the FIR registered on statement of the complainant Johnty Malhotra is as follows. On 01.04.2024 at about 08:20pm, when he was walking on the road outside his house, two BAIL APPLN. 1386/2025 pages GIRISH 5. On being called upon to disclose the evidence so far collected against the accused/applicant, the IO submits that an amount of Rs.500/- was transferred by the accused/applicant to accused Sunny and that the accused/applicant switched off his mobile phone. Apart from these two aspects, there is no other material against the accused

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/july/amit-vs-state-of-nct-of-delhi