# WP(PIL)/13/2025 of KEETHINEEDI AKHIL SRI GURU TEJA Vs THE STATE OF AP

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-01-28
Citation: APHC010040902025
Petitioner: WP(PIL)/13/2025 of KEETHINEEDI AKHIL SRI GURU TEJA
Respondent: THE STATE OF AP

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010040902025_1_2025-01-29.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010040902025 Bench Sr.No:-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3483] AT AMARAVATI WP(PIL) NO: 13 of 2025 Keethineedi Akhil Sri Guru Teja ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Thandava Yogesh Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Advocate General CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 29th January, 2025 PC: The issues which have been raised in the present PIL are also issues which are currently before the Apex Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Prakash Singh and others v. Union of India and others [(2006) 8 SCC 1] and clarified subsequently by virtue of orders, dated 03.07.2018 and 13.03.2019 as reported in (2019) 4 SCC 13 and (2019) 4 SCC 1, have been violated insofar as the appointment of the Director General of Police is concerned. It is stated that the panel of Officers who were left with at least six months of residual service that was required to be sent to the Union Public Service Commission had not been sent. 2 HCJ & RC,J WP(PIL)_13_2025 However, learned counsel for the petitioner doe

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/wp-pil-13-2025-of-keethineedi-akhil-sri-guru-teja-vs-the-state-of-ap