# WP/26338/2024 of KANIKIREDDY KESAVAREDDY Vs THE STATE OF AP

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-01-20
Citation: APHC010508182024
Petitioner: WP/26338/2024 of KANIKIREDDY KESAVAREDDY
Respondent: THE STATE OF AP

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010508182024_1_2025-01-21.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010508182024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3330] (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No: 26338/2024 BETWEEN: Kanikireddy Kesavareddy and Others ...Petitioner(s) AND The State Of Ap and Others ...Respondent(s) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief/s:- “…pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 5 in considering the grievance No.KUR202409302733, dated 30.09.2024 filed by the petitioners herein seeking not to take-up the works under MGNREGS without sanction of the Gramapanchayat and resolutions of respondents 6 to 10 as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and violative of MGNEG Scheme and consequently direct the respondents not to take-up any

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/wp-26338-2024-of-kanikireddy-kesavareddy-vs-the-state-of-ap
