# WP/17658/2014 of Md. Naeuajur Rahman, Vs The A.P State Wakf. Board,

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-01-26
Citation: APHC010086612014
Petitioner: WP/17658/2014 of Md. Naeuajur Rahman,
Respondent: The A.P State Wakf. Board,

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010086612014_1_2025-01-27.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010086612014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3329] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17658/2014 Between: Md. Naeuajur Rahman, ...PETITIONER AND The A P State Wakf Board and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SHAIK KHAJA BASHA The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17658/2014 ORDER: Heard Sri Devi Prasad, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Devi Prasad, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending sha

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/wp-17658-2014-of-md-naeuajur-rahman-vs-the-a-p-state-wakf-board