# UNION OF INDIA & ORS vs PARTHA P. CHATTARAJ & ORS

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-01-23
Citation: W.P.(C)-9038/2014 2025:DHC:412-DB
Petitioner: UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Respondent: PARTHA P. CHATTARAJ & ORS

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/CHS23012025CW90382014_164006.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~91 to 99 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9038/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Anand and Mr. S. Bansal, Advs. versus PARTHA P. CHATTARAJ & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Priyanka M. Bhardwaj, Mr. Maria Mugesh Kannan and Mr. Himanshu Bhardwaj, Advs. W.P.(C) 10246/2015 UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Anand and Mr. S. Bansal, Advs. versus PRADEEEP KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Ms. Priyanka M. Bhardwaj, Mr. Maria Mugesh Kannan and Mr. Himanshu Bhardwaj, Advs. W.P.(C) 10247/2015 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Anand and Mr. S. Bansal, Advs. versus JIGNESH JAYENDRA MODI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Ms. 1. After these matters were heard for some time, Mr. Amit Anand, learned Counsel for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners are, in view of the impugned judgment of the Tribunal, continuing to renew the respondents’ contract for five years at a time and will continue to do so, subject, however, to the outcome of Civil Appeal 16354/2019 pending in the Supreme Court against the judgment dated 1 August 2018 passed by t

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/union-of-india-ors-vs-partha-p-chattaraj-ors