# T. A. N. MOORTHY vs C. K. NARAYAN AND ANR

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-01-02
Citation: APEAL/561/2018
Petitioner: T. A. N. MOORTHY
Respondent: C. K. NARAYAN AND ANR

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6IlAyRGQvS0k4M3JjeGNoamQvcGRrSHc9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiNGsyOG1LaHpHa2FIRzBKWnRJQzdBd1c5Sy9qb3hSNVBnaCtCMDFrbWF1WndlU3NIQXc4WFFSZ3ZGUCtxZWRBQ29PTzVCT21SVTEwamhWSXlhbHFDbHc9PSIsIm1hYyI6ImFjOTExNWEyYTcyZGVlODE2YzUxODY5ZWIxYmUzMzQxOGRiYjY2MWY2OGIzMDJiNjNhNGNlOTIwZmJhYjZhNTIiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782778030&signature=df3ae7466e156ccde3cbdd6ee304608aadbf81f8fc27270364e8e2ff64f59429)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

Cri. Appeal.561.2018.docx H.H. Sawant IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 561 OF 2018 T.A.N.Moorthy Appellant .. (Original Complainant) Versus C.K.Narayan and Anr .. Respondents ....................  Mr. Vijay Kurle a/w. Ms. Priyal Gupta and Mr. Pratik Sarkar, Advocates for Appellant.  Mr. Vishal V. Kale a/w. Mr. Ganesh M. Misal, and Mr. Sunil S. Dude, Advocates for Respondent No.1.  Ms. Sangita E. Phad, APP for Respondent No.2 – State ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 02, 2025 JUDGMENT: 1. Heard Mr. Kurle, learned Advocate for Appellant, Mr. Kale learned Advocate for Respondent No.1 and Ms. Phad, learned APP for State. 2. The present Appeal challenges judgment of acquittal dated 01.10.2015 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate Court, 27 th Court, Mulund in CC No. 274/SS/1996. Appellant – T.A.N. Moorthy is original Complainant, private Respondent No.1 Mr. C.K. Narayan is original Accused and State is Respondent No.2. 3. Parties shall be referred to as “Complainant” (Appellant) and “Accused” (Respondent No.1) for convenience. 1 of 40 Cri. Appeal.561.2018.docx 4. Prior to passing of impugned judgm

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/t-a-n-moorthy-vs-c-k-narayan-and-anr