# SUHAS B.MARATHE vs SHRI MAHADEO GANESH JOGLEKAR

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-01-30
Citation: WP/5389/2000
Petitioner: SUHAS B.MARATHE
Respondent: SHRI MAHADEO GANESH JOGLEKAR

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6IkxPcFJrQVExbGZKbXdsUHc2RHpHWVE9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiM1JwL043T3ZQZVZPaVBueE15dFN3U0E4ZW81SUJUcDVsbGI5WnhjeEVabFFwc0VYMkJKRTdwSjdCUzduWU4rajZCajE0c2t5NXB5dndUQlg4VHhySHc9PSIsIm1hYyI6ImQ0MWZhNjNkZDdhOWUxODY4OTg0MjM1MDllMjljYjljOGIwMDY3NTg3OWFhOWUwNWZmOTgxODUwZWM5N2NmZTciLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782777920&signature=19ef40eccb1b05a2e1359acac336d6af6aa778b64d06d19d5ee0881cad266842)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

204-WP-5389-2000.doc Vaibhav IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5389 OF 2000 Suhas B. Marathe …Petitioner Versus 1(a). Balwant Mahadeo Joglekar & Ors. …Respondents _______________________________________________________________ Mr. Yashodhan Divekar a/w Siddhant Varunkar i/b M/s. Divekar & Co., for the Petitioner. Mr. M. L. Patil, for the Respondents. Mr. Drupad S. Patil - Amicus Curiae. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 30 JANUARY 2025 JUDGMENT: 1. Heard Mr. Divekar, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, Mr. M. L. Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents and Mr. Drupad Patil, learned Amicus Curiae. QUESTION OF LAW: 2. In this Writ Petition an interesting question of law concerning the interpretation of Section 23 of the The Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (“Bombay Rent Act”) is raised. It is the contention of the Petitioner – Landlord that if the tenantable repairs are carried out to the suit premises by the tenant then in one year only one-fourth of the aggregate of yearly rent can be deducted or 1 204-WP-5389-2000

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/suhas-b-marathe-vs-shri-mahadeo-ganesh-joglekar