# SIDDHILAXMI ENCLAVE PVT LTD. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-01-03
Citation: WP/10246/2024
Petitioner: SIDDHILAXMI ENCLAVE PVT LTD.
Respondent: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6InBWM3gwQXJUL0pFaWp6UHh3UEs0U1E9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiNzJUNDZXZkRMVysyRVl5NWk0RU9yV2dER1FiZjZxb1BERld2Qi9kYVpPbzN4dHVUdlNwSEx3MlM5c2d2Rkp4QXRFZlBtMFpMYmJCTUdYRWJrN1RQcnc9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjViZTc1OWE2NTFlZTQ3N2I1NDZhNWNlMjYwMzdlNThhYmNkODU0NzVhN2QxNDkzNmM0N2M3N2I4ZDYwODE0NjYiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782778030&signature=d2b0599266e999b8563ce4802618678998f91e9ebabe4e02b48ff7592f7aa46d)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

spkng-2-ASWP-15309-23,10246-24.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10246 OF 2024 Siddhilaxmi Enclave Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary & Ors …Respondents Ms. Siddhi Sawant, i/b Nikhil Waje, for Petitioner. CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 3, 2025 PC : 1. The above Application has been filed for the speaking to the minutes of the order dated December 20, 2024. The correction sought is in the appearance column. In the judgment/order in Writ Petition No. 10246 of 2024, the following appearance is shown for the Petitioner:- “Ms. Siddhi Sawant, i/b Nikhil Waje, for Petitioner in WP/10246/2024.” Instead, it should be reflected as under: “Karl Tamboly i/b Nikhil Waje for Petitioner in WP/10246/2024”. 2. The same is accordingly ordered. VALLAKATI Date: 2025.01.08 19:13:14 +0530 January 3, 2025 Ashwini Vallakati spkng-2-ASWP-15309-23,10246-24.doc 3. No other correction is sought. The correction shall be carried out in the original order as well as in the copy uploaded on the server. 4. This order will be 1. Area Manager Regional Office, MIDC, Mahape 2

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/siddhilaxmi-enclave-pvt-ltd-vs-state-of-maharashtra-through-its-principal-secretary-and-ors