# SAURABH CHADHA vs STATE AND ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-01-08
Citation: CRL.M.C.-3509/2021 2025:DHC:221
Petitioner: SAURABH CHADHA
Respondent: STATE AND ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/NBK08012025CRLMM35092021_113923.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 08 January, 2025 CRL.M.C. 3509/2021 & CRL.M.A. 20874/2021 SAURABH CHADHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rupendra Pratap Singh & Mr. Sameer Vats, Advocates Versus STATE AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Additional Public Prosecutor & Ms.Mansi Sharma, Advocate, Respondent-State with with SI Parveen Kumar, PS Malviya Nagar. Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( ‘Cr.P.C.’ hereinafter) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for quashing of FIR No.493/2021, under Sections 323/341/354/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’), registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar, New Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom. 2. It is averred that Respondent No. 2-Ms. Neera Sharma, the Complainant of the FIR in question, is the cousin sister (real mama’s CRL.M.C. 3509/2021 3. It is asserted that on 11.08.2021, Petitioner No.1-Mr. Saurabh Chadha, had received call from Respondent No.2 on his mother’s mobile, who was not well on that day. Petitioner No.1 picked u

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/saurabh-chadha-vs-state-and-anr
