# MR. TUKARAM SUBHANA BHOSALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ORS.

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-01-06
Citation: WP/5262/2017
Petitioner: MR. TUKARAM SUBHANA BHOSALE
Respondent: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ORS.

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6IkQrT1lVMW13NzA3N2NRa05JTEdwMEE9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiVE9CZTlxQ1hXSlZBNTZ6bmN5SGdGMEVWVWRoRFlPZ3lvMzI2SVI0bnVIRFVMZXF4S3hjV3BiamlzWkxEdjFWajc2TmRCQ2NiZnN2VWszaUxLbXdKYVE9PSIsIm1hYyI6ImY2YmFlMjNjN2UzODE5MjcwMjllODNkMTBkMjYzZTVhYTQwYjJhZWM2ZDQwOWUwMTg1MDRmN2FmNmMzMTQ2ZTUiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782778030&signature=3a417369e9394c2f6f05ea701da8cdd60b0bd67dc6c04329da84ebee6d30d560)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

WP-5109.17&ORS (F).DOCX 2025:BHC-AS:312-DB Darshan Patil IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5109 OF 2017 Dnyaneshwar Lingappa Bhosale ] since deceased through legal heir ] son – Narendra Dnyaneshwar Bhosale ] Age – 24, Occupation, Worker, Residing at 2718, ] Ravivar Peth, Joshi Galli, ] Solapur – 413 002 ]…..Petitioner. Versus 1] The State of Maharashtra ] through the Secretary, ] Housing Department & Special ] Assistance Department, ] Govt. of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, ] Mumbai – 400 032 ] ] 2] The Secretary, ] Revenue Department, ] Govt. of Maharashtra, Mantralaya ] Mumbai – 400 032 ] ] 3] The Collector of Solapur, ] Solapur – 413 001 ] ] 4] The Chief Officer, ] Pune Housing & Area Development Board ] Agarkar Nagar, Pune – 1 ] ] 5] The Chief Executive Officer & ] Vice-President, Maharashtra Housing & ] Area Development Authority, ] WP-5109.17&ORS (F).DOCX Grihanirman Bhavan, Bandra (East) ] Mumbai – 400051 ] ] 6] The Solapur Municipal Corporation ] Solapur – 413 001. ]…..Respondents ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5262 OF 2017 Mr. Tukaram Subhana Bhosale ] Age – 66, Occupation – Worker, Residing at ] 27/5, Ravivar Peth, Joshi Galli,

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/mr-tukaram-subhana-bhosale-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra-through-the-secretary-and-ors