# KANTA RANI & ANR. vs POONAM JAIN

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-01-16
Citation: RC.REV.-347/2024 2025:DHC:541
Petitioner: KANTA RANI & ANR.
Respondent: POONAM JAIN

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59016012025RCR3472024_110446.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 16.01.2025 RC.REV. 347/2024 & CM APPL. 68339/2024 KANTA RANI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Vandna Aneja, Ms. Smriti & Mr. Aditya Sharma, Advocates. versus POONAM JAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Farman Ali, Mr. Piyush Gupta & Ms. Usha Jamnal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners/tenants impugning the order dated 11.07.2024 [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”] passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller-02, Central, Tis Hazari, Delhi. By the Impugned Order, the Leave to Defend/Contest Application filed by the Petitioners/tenants has been dismissed with respect to the premises i.e., Shop No.4 (Self-Marked), situated at Ground Floor, Property bearing No. 2628/1, 2674 to 2677, Gali Munde Wali, Sadar Bazar, Delhi-110006 [hereinafter referred to as “subject premises”]. 2. After a brief examination of the matter, this Court had passed a direction on 22.11.2024 that, prima facie, the Impugned Order has dealt with the contentions raised by the Petitioners/tenants, including in p

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/kanta-rani-anr-vs-poonam-jain