# CRLRC/2014/2011 of PANDARATHI HANEEFA Vs THE STATE, THROUGH SHO., ELURU I TOWN PS.,

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-01-27
Citation: APHC010083422011
Petitioner: CRLRC/2014/2011 of PANDARATHI HANEEFA
Respondent: THE STATE, THROUGH SHO., ELURU I TOWN PS.,

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010083422011_1_2025-01-28.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

1 rl IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. SRINIVAS CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOS. 2012 & 2014 OF 2011 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2Q12 nf 7nn Between: 1. Puli Lakshmana Swamy, S/o. Veera Raghavulu, Aged about 40 years, Occ; Cultivation R/o. Kankatava Guduru Mandal, Krishna District. 2. Thotakura Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Venkata Ratnam @ Venkata Rao Aged about 32 years, Occ; Business R/o. Poranki Village, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3. Parambathazhath Ibrahim Moosa, S/o. Ibrahim Aged about 41 years. Occ: Business R/o. Parambathazhath House, Korattykkara Post, Thrishur District, Kerala State. ...Petitioners/Appellants/ Accused Nos.1, 5 & 8 AND The State, through SHO, Eluru I Town PS., West Godavari District, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. at Hyderabad. ...Respondent/Respondent/Complainant Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the judgment (common) passed in Crl.A.No.9 of 2009 dated 26-09-2011 on

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/crlrc-2014-2011-of-pandarathi-haneefa-vs-the-state-through-sho-eluru-i-town-ps