# CMA/682/2008 of PANTHADI BABY R/O KAKINADA, E.G.DISTRICT Vs PANTHADI SURESH R/O JAGANNAICKPUR, KAKINADA, E.G.DIST

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-01-21
Citation: APHC010113072008
Petitioner: CMA/682/2008 of PANTHADI BABY R/O KAKINADA, E.G.DISTRICT
Respondent: PANTHADI SURESH R/O JAGANNAICKPUR, KAKINADA, E.G.DIST

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010113072008_1_2025-01-22.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010113072008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3509] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 682/2008 Between: Panthadi Baby R/o Kakinada, E.g.district ...APPELLANT AND Panthadi Suresh R/o Jagannaickpur Kakinada E G Dist ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 682/2008 JUDGMENT: (per Challa Gunaranjan, J) The respondent-husband preferred HMOP.No.428 of 2003 under Section 10(ix) & (x) of Indian Divorce Act, 1869 for dissolution of marriage, which was allowed by an order dated 07.07.2005. Against which, the present appeal is preferred by the wife. 2. The docket proceedings indicates that on 19.08.2008 it was brought to the notice of the Court that since the respondent-husband got remarried on 17.03.2006, the appeal itself has become infructuous. 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/cma-682-2008-of-panthadi-baby-r-o-kakinada-e-g-district-vs-panthadi-suresh-r-o-jagannaickpur-kakinada-e-g-dist