# CHARUSHILA BIRA SHRIRAM vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND ORS

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-01-03
Citation: WP/9981/2024
Petitioner: CHARUSHILA BIRA SHRIRAM
Respondent: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND ORS

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6Ik5pUWl6ajBZbDlQaldaZ3g3T2paeEE9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiS3VyM3VtVGRNNkQ1Smd5ODlEd1pDd3N4UVF2aVgxOXIzc2Z5cWlpamlsQ3p4UU9wOXVyS3B1MXl2ZWVZbEJSdWhSQWcxTEZmTWs2QVlvU3JGZnoyZ0E9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjAwOTdmYjc3ZmMxYTU1ZmQxMzRmNDQ1ODU5ZjBiZjAxZWZiNWYxZjMzYTg3ZWMzYTE3ZGVlYTBlNDE0ZGNhMTciLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782778030&signature=aeeaea0878a5b4b5a0859dea628ccfded201f08c545227bf23d55662384e875a)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

WP-9981-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1. The State of Maharashtra ] Through the District Collector, Pune ] District, Collector Office, Pune. ] 2. The Tahsildar Haveli, Haveli, Pune ] 3. Gram Sevak, Grampanchayat Bhavdi, Tal ] – Haveli, District – Pune. ] 4. Bapu Chandrakant Handgar ] Age : 36 years, Occ- Agriculture ] Residing at Bhavdi, Tal – Haveli, District ] Pune. ] 5. Kisan Chandrakant Tambe ] Age : 43 years, Occ- Agriculture ] Residing at Bhavid, Tal – Haveli, District ] Pune. ] 6. Poonam Mahesh Kadam ] Age : 30 years, Occ- Homemaker ] Residing at Bhavdi, Tal- Haveli, ] District Pune. ] 7. Sudhir Phulchand Kardale ] Age : 42 years, Occ-Agriculture ] Residing at Bhavdi, Tal- Haveli, ] District Pune. ] 8. Ashabai Namdev Tambe ] Age:55 years, Occ- Homemaker ] Residing at Bhavdi, Tal-Haveli, District ] Pune. ] 9. Rajni Somnath Tambe ] Age : 33 years, Occ-Homemaker ] Shubham Talle 1 of 17 WP-9981-2024.doc Residing at Bhavdi, Tal- Haveli, District ] Pune. ] 10. Tarabai Sambhaji Handgar ] Age : 54 years, Occ- Homemaker ] Residing at Bhavdi, Tal- Haveli, District ] Pune. ] 11. Ramdas Maruti Dhage ] Age: 37 years, Occ- Transport ] Resi

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/charushila-bira-shriram-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra-through-the-district-collector-and-ors