# BHAGWAT PRASAD SHARMA & ANR vs SATISH KUMAR & ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-01-29
Citation: MAC.APP.-149/2019 2025:DHC:509
Petitioner: BHAGWAT PRASAD SHARMA & ANR
Respondent: SATISH KUMAR & ANR

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59529012025MACA1492019_185252.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 29th January, 2025 MAC.APP. 149/2019, CM APPL. 3620/2019, CM APPL. 3622/2019 & CM APPL. 15971/2019 BHAGWAT PRASAD SHARMA & ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr. S.K. Tyagi, Adv. versus SATISH KUMAR & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Ms. Ridhima Gaur & Ms. Ring Baliyaan, Advs. (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN AMIT MAHAJAN, J. (Oral) 1. The present appeal is filed challenging the award dated 20.09.2018 (hereafter ‘the impugned award’) passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts in MAC No. 2280/16. 2. The impugned award has been challenged on the ground that the appellant was, though holding a valid Insurance Policy of the offending vehicle, however, the liability has still been fastened on the appellant being the owner of the offending vehicle. 3. The defence raised by the Insurance Company that the insurance policy was cancelled on dishonour of the cheque which was issued at the time of issuance of policy, was accepted by the learned Tribunal and it was held that the responsibility for 4. The appellant relies upon the policy cover note whic

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/bhagwat-prasad-sharma-anr-vs-satish-kumar-anr