# APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 41426 of 2024 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2025-01-16
Citation: APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 41426 of 2024 at Allahabad
Petitioner: APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 41426 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=43623)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

A.F.R. Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:7542 Court No. - 77 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 41426 of 2024 Applicant :- Anant Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Dhirendra Kr. Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Brijesh Kr. Dwivedi, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking quashing of the summoning order dated 21.6.2024 as well as the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 10707 of 2024, under Section 23 of Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994, P.S. Balua, District Chandauli, pending before C.J.M., Chandauli. 3. The sole contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the summoning order ex facie is illegal, being passed by non-application of mind. It is further submitted that the Apex Court in the case of Lalankumar Singh and others vs. State of Maharashtra; 2022 SCC Online 1383 has clearly observed that summoning a person is a serious matter and while summoning a person, the court should record its satisfact

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/application-u-s-482-no-41426-of-2024-at-allahabad