# ABDUL SATTAR & ANR vs MASLAH UDDIN

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-01-22
Citation: CM APPL.-3047/2024 2025:DHC:448
Petitioner: ABDUL SATTAR & ANR
Respondent: MASLAH UDDIN

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59022012025CMA30472024_172433.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 22.01.2025 RC.REV. 679/2019 ABDUL SATTAR & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Bahar U. Barqi and Mr. Maroof Ahmad, Advocates. versus MASLAH UDDIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Himal Akhtar, Mr. Juned Salmani and Ms. Rehana, Advocates for LRs of Respondent with Mohd. Sheriyaz in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CM APPL. 3047/2024 [User charges] 1. This is an Application for affixation of user and occupation charges. 2. Pleadings have been completed in the Application. 3. The only contention that is raised by the learned Counsel for the Petitioners/tenants is that user charges are not payable because the subject matter in issue is not under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [hereinafter referred to as “DRC Act”]. However, learned Counsel for the Petitioners/tenants is unable to deny that there is an eviction order dated 13.08.2019 [hereinafter referred to as "Impugned Order"] passed under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act which has been challenged by the Petitioners/tenants before this Court under the provisions of Section 25-B(8) of the DRC Act. 3.1 Learned Counsel for the Petiti

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/january/abdul-sattar-anr-vs-maslah-uddin