# WP/6267/2015 of K. Kurmanaikulu Vs State of Andhra Pradesh,

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-02-18
Citation: APHC010280272015
Petitioner: WP/6267/2015 of K. Kurmanaikulu
Respondent: State of Andhra Pradesh,

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010280272015_1_2025-02-19.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010280272015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6267/2015 Between: K. Kurmanaikulu and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K S MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities 3. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 4. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “….to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent authorities in forcing the Petitioners to vacate D.No.1215, Ichapuram without issuing notice for paying compensation is illegal and unconstitutional while declaring that the Respondent authorities cannot take possession of D.No.12-1-5 either in full or any part or demolish house or part of it without paying compensation after d

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/wp-6267-2015-of-k-kurmanaikulu-vs-state-of-andhra-pradesh