# WP/4273/2025 of mt.Lakki Yashoda Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-02-24
Citation: APHC010079742025
Petitioner: WP/4273/2025 of mt.Lakki Yashoda
Respondent: The State of Andhra Pradesh

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010079742025_1_2025-02-28.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010093582025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3331] (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 5044/2025 Between: Gampa Subbaiah ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DHEERA KANISHKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following ORDER: The petitioner, Line Inspector, Porumamilla section, filed the above writ petition impugning the proceedings vide Memo No.SE/O/KDP/ADM/PO/JAO/J2/F.04/D.No.285/25 dated 31.01.2025 (Ex.P.8) issued by the 4th respondent and the consequential proceedings vide Memo No.EE/OPN/MDK/JAO/Adm/S1/F.Confi/D.No.221/2025 dated 06.02.2025 (Ex.P.9) issued by the 5th respondent are illegal and arbitrary. 2 2. Heard Sri Dheera Kanishk, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Jyothiratna Anumolu, learned counsel representing Sri k.V.Ramana Rao, learned standing counsel for respondents 2 to 4. 3. The petitioner is working as a Line Inspector in the 2nd respondent Corporation. Whi

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/wp-4273-2025-of-mt-lakki-yashoda-vs-the-state-of-andhra-pradesh-andhra-pradesh-2