# WP/36918/2015 of Peethala Papayamma, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh,

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-02-17
Citation: APHC010613532015
Petitioner: WP/36918/2015 of Peethala Papayamma,
Respondent: The State of Andhra Pradesh,

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010613532015_1_2025-02-18.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 36918 OF 2015 Between: Appa Rao, Aged about 68 years, R/o.aNo.27-130 Appanna Palem Vepagunta, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. Sri Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy vari, Devasthanam Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District, A.P., Represented bv its Executive Officer. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus, declaring the action of the 2 nd respondent in interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of her property, an extent of Ac.14.00 cts in Sy.No.30 Part of Vepagunta Village Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District without instituting any proceedings known to law, as ille

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/wp-36918-2015-of-peethala-papayamma-vs-the-state-of-andhra-pradesh