# WP/30378/2024 of DONTHAM SETTY VINAY KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-02-18
Citation: APHC010583342024
Petitioner: WP/30378/2024 of DONTHAM SETTY VINAY KUMAR
Respondent: THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010583342024_1_2025-02-19.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

1 APHC010583342024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 30378/2024 Between: Dontham Setty Vinay Kumar and others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GRANDHI PRIYANKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “….to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Notices vide Notice No.57/1031/NLR/UC/2024 dated 16.12.2024, Notice No.65/1031/NLR/UC/2024 dated 16.12.2024, Notice No.87/1031/NLR/UC/2024 dated 17.12.2024, Notice rd No.88/1031/NLR/UC/2024 dated 17.12.2024 issued by the 3 respondent to the petitioners respectively as illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction and to consequently set aside the same….” 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: a) The petitioners herein are in peaceful po

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/wp-30378-2024-of-dontham-setty-vinay-kumar-vs-the-state-of-andhra-pradesh