# WP/11079/2012 of V Rajya Lakhsmi Vs The District Collector Cum-Selection

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-02-17
Citation: APHC010246752012
Petitioner: WP/11079/2012 of V Rajya Lakhsmi
Respondent: The District Collector Cum-Selection

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010246752012_1_2025-02-18.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010246752012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457] (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY , THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11079/2012 Between: V Rajya Lakhsmi ...PETITIONER AND The District Collector Cumselection and ...RESPONDENT(S) Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TADDI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following Order: There is no representation for the petitioner today. 2. When the matter is called, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner is challenging the appointment of the 5th respondent as Anganwadi worker. It is submitted that the 5th respondent was selected by the selection committee and orders of appointment were issued. After she was placed at seniority No.1 in the merit list, the selection committee, consisting of the ICDS 2 Project Director, District Welfare Officer(DWO) and Child Development Agency (CDA), District Magistrate (DM), Head Office (HO), the local MLA, and the RDO, conducted the interviews, and the 5th respondent secured the highest marks in the

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/wp-11079-2012-of-v-rajya-lakhsmi-vs-the-district-collector-cum-selection