# UNION OF INDIA THROUGH PCMM vs EMAMI AGROTECH LTD.

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-02-26
Citation: IA/3020/2021
Petitioner: UNION OF INDIA THROUGH PCMM
Respondent: EMAMI AGROTECH LTD.

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6InY1Wk1oSk1idlgzWjF3VVpETVVKdFE9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiS09ZRTlWeW9iZ3IzdWJISkNycXlVVVhuUHFoaW0xTDJkbXhHT0lCdm1PSTd3V29uWW4yNjBkeTAvaFB5ZCtCN3UyRUpOUGxFNmtlUEpUb0tENzcvRVE9PSIsIm1hYyI6ImIzYTc5NWNiODIwZWU4ZjVkN2VjYTcxZmM5M2VkZWM5ZTJlYmM5Mzk1OWUwNWFiZmZiZmU2MmYzZTY2ZmU5NjYiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782777490&signature=6982b123b1f05d58b80b32cc9575bc61534af9b4439c91067a1b8b08ab4b85b7)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

ARBP-458-2021-F.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 458 OF 2021 WITH Digitally INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3020 OF 2021 signed by SHRADDHA IN SHRADDHA KAMLESH KAMLESH TALEKAR TALEKAR Date: ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 458 OF 2021 2025.02.26 11:03:37 +0530 Union of India through PCMM, Central Railway ...Petitioner Versus Emami Agrotech Ltd. ...Respondent/Orig. Claimant Mr. T.J. Pandian a/w. Gautam Modanwal and Noorjahan Khan, for Petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Desai a/w. Mr. Rohit Balani i/b M/s. The Fort Circle, for Respondent. CORAM : SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J. Reserved on : February 20, 2025 Pronounced on : February 26, 2025 JUDGEMENT : Context and Factual Background: 1. The challenge in this Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”) is to an arbitral award dated February 1, 2020 (“ Impugned Award”), which allows a claim made by the Respondent, Emami Agrotech Ltd. (“ Emami”) against the Petitioner, the Central Railway (“Central Railway”). February 26, 2025 Shraddha ARBP-458-2021-F.doc 2. The Central Railway had deducted an amount of Rs. 48,75,400 from the amounts payable to Em

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/union-of-india-through-pcmm-vs-emami-agrotech-ltd-bombay-2