# TILAK RAJ SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-02-18
Citation: W.P.(C)-772/2018 2025:DHC:1041-DB
Petitioner: TILAK RAJ SINGH
Respondent: UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/67918022025CW7722018_142915.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 772/2018 TILAK RAJ SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anju Gupta with Mr. Bhuvan Goel and Mr. Shubham Grover, Advs for R-1, 2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 18.02.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. REVIEW PET. 87/2025 1. This review petition seeks review of the judgment dated 17 January 2025 passed by us whereby we have dismissed WP (C) 772/2018. 2. The issue in the writ petition pertained to LTC1 availed by the review petitioner, who was the petitioner in the writ petition. The LTC was originally sought for travel to Trivandrum, which was subsequently changed to Goa, via Mumbai. The petitioner decided, 1 Leave Travel Concession 3. In our judgment, we have taken note of the relevant instructions which unmistakably require prior permission of the competent authority to be taken in the event of change of destination midway. It is only where unavoidable circumstances exist, as would make it impossible to take such prior permission, that change of LTC can be granted even if there is change of destination.

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/tilak-raj-singh-vs-union-of-india-and-ors